The Book Of Jasher

Book of Jasher (biblical references)

The bottom line is that you, as the reader, will have to answer the question of legitimacy for yourself.

Lost Jewish texts Religious texts. Certainly any reader who is familiar with the Bible will recognize its similarity to the text of Jasher. It has all the characteristics that you would expect to see in a forgery. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people avenged themselves upon their enemies. It makes no claim to being the Biblical Jasher and would never be taken for it.

The book is mentioned twice in the Hebrew Bible. There probably is no way that we can know that the Biblical writer s quoted from this book, english-luganda dictionary rather than the other way around? Is it possible that this book was reverse engineered? The most obvious feature is that it claims to be the work of a man named Jasher who was the son of Caleb and one of the Judges of Israel.

This account is easily recognized as the same story as that of Theseus, who slew the minotaur. So, this title has been a popular one for rabbinical writings, but most are clearly not intended to have been passed off as the book mentioned in the Bible. It is clear that the author had no real knowledge of Hebrew and failed to recognize that Jasher is not a proper noun. There are a couple mysterious accounts of incidents that smack of Greek or Roman mythology, such as the story of Zepho, the grandson of Esau who slew a half human monster in a large cave. The first step in dealing with the question of authenticity is to simply read the book with an open mind.

Book of Jasher Chapter 1

This seems to be its entire reason for existence. Clearly this book is a fake. This first is, of course, this book.

So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day. Much of this material can be recognized from other works of ancient history. You will also have much food for thought in regard to the issues of conventional chronology in ancient times. Indeed, there is a great deal of commonality with accounts from other midrashic sources.

Book of Jasher Chapter 1

There are chapters dealing wholly with events in Egypt or events in Europe. It is hard to imagine that this book would be counterfeited for that purpose or any other. It contains no useful details, and only the barest account of the familiar Hebrew stories. Non-canonical books referenced in the Bible.

There is one notable exception which I will mention later. The presence of this event in a book of poetry has been interpreted as a poetic description of the prolonged battle. And there was no day like that before it or after it, that the Lord hearkened to the voice of man, for the Lord fought for Israel.

The Real Book of Jasher

It rather carries the meaning of the upright book or the faithful record. The characters and the setting are different. And the sun stood still in the midst of the heavens, and it stood still six and thirty moments, and the moon also stood still and hastened not to go down a whole day. While the above two references pass the test, it will be up to the reader to satisfy himself as to the general agreement of the entirety of the book with the Bible narrative.

Containing the Old and New Testaments. Even the most casual reader will find Jasher enlightening. Jasher's narrative ends long before the time of David. But such a scenario seems very unlikely, since rabbinical writings have a great deal of credibility otherwise, and no major effort of promoting this book for that purpose has ever occurred.

If this were found to be so it would in no way diminish its value. The accuracy and credibility of this supposed Pseudo-Jasher is absolute genius. Whichever side of that issue you take, I think that you will be enlightened by exploring the issue and by reading the book. Is it not written in the book of Jasher?

To be sure, if Jasher be true, there needs to be a radical alteration in the conventional interpretation of ancient history, especially in the area of chronology. If this be a forgery it is a marvelous one. To anyone familiar with ancient history, it will be obvious that Jasher places these events in a radically different time period than do conventional historians. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In actuality, we have a wonderful example of just such a fraud. Articles containing Hebrew-language text. The next issue to investigate in regard to the authenticity of this book is the two passages which mention the book by name. The third book is widely recognized for the fraud that it is.

In contrast, this incident is not a direct quotation of a historical event from Jasher, as is the case in Joshua. The issue is compounded by the existence of several works by the name Sefer Hayasher. It also misses the reference to the bow. There are, of course, many examples of such pious counterfeits from the early new testament period.

Though one might doubt the veracity of these tales, there is nothing here that should dissuade an objective reader from the opinion that this book is genuine. Finally, consider how Josephus described the Book of Jasher. Could someone have fabricated this book by incorporating a huge number of additional details into the framework of Bible stories, and do it with such accuracy as to be convincing? In any case, if this were true, it is such a masterful job as to be a very valuable work in it's own right. Behold it is written in the book of Jasher.

There are digressions from the biblical narrative that show concurrent events in other parts of the world. It is not unlikely that some numbers could get scrambled.

The Book of Jasher - What is it Should the Book of Jasher be in the Bible

Perhaps that Book of Jasher from the Amoraim period was compiled from rabbinic sources such that it is a kind of digest of rabbinic traditions. Accounts in the Bible can be made more lucid and easier to understand with the background of Jasher in mind.

It has been republished by the Rosicrucian Order. There is simply no motive for such an act. Such a fraudulent writer would not have needed to add so much detail into the account to be convincing. The original author may have simply reported those things because they were popular folklore of his day.

So the contrast between that imitation and this book is very telling. This is such an extensive comparison, and such an obvious one, that I will not attempt to make any verse by verse comparison. It is very brief and contains no unique information except the one thing that is so absurd as to expose it as a hoax. It is easy to see which is genuine. Is it possible that someone created this book as a clever fraud, by appropriating the name of the Biblical Jasher to give the work credibility?